Once again, Susie Bright nails it with Romances and Raincoats, her account of the Romantic Times convention.
Because Romances are written so tightly to genre, and the predictability factor is so important to their buyers, they can’t overhaul their image that much. The explicitness of the sex scenes is the only wiggle room they have. Now that every sexual taboo has been broken, they’re a little anxious, because if they add any note of realism or literary feeling, they won’t be “romances” anymore, and the genre will crack. It already has.
The 'cracking' of the genre has interested me for a while, because as a result, there has been an explosion of hybrid romance, straddling mystery, military, science and fantasy fictions in a new way. i go to a lot of science fiction conventions, and meet many writers doing romance and SF.
A terrific post, though i have a few quibbles. First, i think i might get why Laurell K. Hamilton is not encouraging her readers to experiment as freely as Anita Blake, and seems so overprotective. Many women dip a toe into the kink scene looking for romance as well as orgasms. When this happens, the potential for serious physical and psychological harm is raised. i'm not saying that BDSM isn't worth the risk (i would never say that), but when introduced in romance or vampire fantasy mysteries, the reader has insufficient tools to gauge risks. An aroused reader might conclude that soliciting a rape fantasy with a stranger or recent acquaintance is too risky, but bondage isn't. Well, maybe. Maybe not. How about suspension? Breath control? Add the dynamics of D/s (fundamentally a romantic endeavor) and the need to control or comply can overwhelm caution. A person who in daily life is fairly good at risk avoidance may not be so when emulating fictional characters. In this specific, i think romance novels differ from porn videos, though there's a lot to learn from the comparison Susie makes. She makes some remarks on the differences herself in the comments. If you talk to folks at a fetish party about how they sought out the scene, a large number of males and a larger number of females say Story of O or The Sleeping Beauty Books or those awful Gor novels were catalysts. i find Hamilton's recent work dull, and liked Anita more when she was uptight, casually dressed, and Catholic. But perhaps she may be trying to look out for her more tender readers, knowing that the intrepid will not be deterred. Of course, i wasn't there, didn't hear what LKH said, and wished i could see the corseted bodyguards!
The other thing is romance vs. erotica. Of course if you write finely crafted erotica you will feel more creatively satisfied. But most of the romance writers i've spoken with are trying to earn a living - a tough job in any niche today. They struggle to stay true enough to form to be rehired, yet push the envelope enough to keep things interesting for themselves and their readers.